___________
There have been reports suggesting that the Manhattan District Attorney's office has been contacting journalists to influence their coverage of the Daniel Penny case. According to posts found on X, there's discontent about the DA's office allegedly emailing journalists with instructions on what details to include in their stories about Penny. This has been interpreted by some as an attempt to control the narrative surrounding the case.
If convicted, Penny faces up to 15 years in prison. Under a barrage of public criticism for bringing charges, the prosecutors in Alvin Bragg's office have been on a mission to remind the jury that Penny may not get any prison time at all, even if he is found guilty. That's down to the fact there is no minimum sentence for two of the charges he is facing. The DA's office has been contacting news outlets, including Daily Mail, requesting for that fact to be pushed to the forefront of coverage.
🚨 #BREAKING Daniel Penny jurors tell judge they can't agree on top charge in subway chokehold case
12/6/2024 -
__________
Daniel Penny Trial vs. 5 'Teens' who beat an elderly man to death in D.C.
Daniel Penny tried to protect people and is being charged while 5 'Teens' beat an elderly man to death in D.C. What do you notice about this picture?
__________
There are not that many good samaritans left. Regardless of the outcome, this sham process has established a precedent for what could happen to you.
12/5/2024 - As of 06:51 PM on December 05, 2024 EST, the jury in the trial of Daniel Penny is now in its third day of deliberations. Daniel Penny is charged with second-degree manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide in connection with the chokehold death of Jordan Neely on a New York City subway in May 2023. If convicted of manslaughter, Penny faces up to 15 years in prison.
During the deliberations, the jury has asked to review several pieces of evidence, including police body camera footage, bystander video, and Penny's police interview, indicating a thorough examination of the case details. They have also requested readbacks of testimony, particularly from the city medical examiner who concluded that Penny's chokehold killed Neely.
Posts on X suggest a range of sentiments, with some users expressing support for Penny and describing him as innocent, while others discuss the jury's considerations and the potential impact of public opinion on the verdict. However, these posts are not conclusive evidence but rather reflect current public discourse on the trial.
No verdict has been reached yet, and the court has taken breaks, including for lunch, during the ongoing deliberations.
__________
12/5/2024 - As of the latest updates, the jury in the Daniel Penny trial, where he is charged with manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide in connection with the chokehold death of Jordan Neely on a New York City subway in May 2023, has entered its third day of deliberations. The trial has focused on whether Penny's use of force was justified, with the defense arguing that Penny acted to protect subway passengers from Neely's aggressive behavior.
Key points include:
The jury has requested to review specific pieces of evidence, including police and bystander videos, as well as a readback of testimony from the city medical examiner, Dr. Cynthia Harris, who concluded that Neely died from neck compression due to the chokehold.
Defense attorneys have argued that Neely's death was not solely due to the chokehold, suggesting other factors like Neely's sickle cell trait, schizophrenia, synthetic marijuana use, and the physical struggle might have contributed to his death.
The defense rested its case without calling Penny to testify, relying instead on character witnesses and expert testimony, including a forensic pathologist who disputed the medical examiner's findings on the cause of death.
The prosecution's case highlighted Penny's actions as reckless, with some witnesses describing Neely's behavior as threatening but not indicating that the chokehold was necessary to the extent used.
Deliberations are ongoing, with no verdict reached as of the latest updates.
The jury deliberation process in a trial is a critical phase where jurors collectively review the evidence, discuss the facts of the case, and attempt to reach a verdict. Here's an overview of how this process typically unfolds:
Selection of a Foreperson:
Once the jury retires to the deliberation room, one of the first tasks is to elect a foreperson. This individual will lead the discussions, ensure everyone has a chance to speak, and usually deliver the verdict. The selection can be informal, based on a vote or consensus.
Review of Evidence and Instructions:
Jurors are given access to the evidence presented during the trial, including exhibits, and they often receive written copies of the judge's instructions on the law. These instructions guide the jury on how to apply the law to the facts of the case. If jurors need clarification or want testimony reread, they can request this through the court officer or bailiff.
Discussion and Analysis:
Jurors discuss the evidence, testimonies, and legal instructions. This is a time for open dialogue where jurors can express their opinions, debate interpretations of the law and facts, and attempt to persuade each other through reasoning. The aim is to reach a consensus, though in some civil cases, unanimity might not be required. In criminal cases, however, the verdict must be unanimous in federal courts and most state courts.
Voting:
At various points, jurors might take votes to gauge where the group stands. Votes can be done by show of hands, secret ballot, or other methods agreed upon by the jury. If the initial vote shows a split, further discussion ensues until a unanimous decision is reached or it becomes clear that the jury is deadlocked.
Reaching a Verdict:
If jurors agree, the foreperson records the verdict on the appropriate form. In criminal cases, this would be "guilty" or "not guilty" for each charge. In civil cases, it might involve answering specific questions from the judge's charge. The jury then informs the judge that they have a verdict, and everyone returns to the courtroom for the verdict to be read.
Hung Jury:
If jurors cannot agree after reasonable deliberation, they might inform the judge of their deadlock, leading to a hung jury and potentially a mistrial. The judge might give additional instructions or ask the jury to deliberate further before deciding if a mistrial should be declared.
Confidentiality and Restrictions:
Deliberations are confidential; jurors are not allowed to discuss the case with anyone outside the jury until a verdict is reached or the trial concludes. They are also instructed to avoid any outside influence, including media, to keep their deliberations based solely on the evidence presented in court.
Duration:
There is no set time for deliberations; it can range from minutes to days, depending on the case's complexity, the jurors' dynamics, and how quickly they can reach a consensus.
Commenti