top of page

News Media Apocalypse

Writer's picture: 17GEN417GEN4

Updated: 1 day ago




Allen Media Group, the owner of nearly two dozen television stations across the United States, has recently undertaken significant cost-cutting measures, particularly affecting its meteorological staff. Here's a detailed overview based on the available information:


  • Layoff of Meteorologists: Allen Media Group has decided to replace all local meteorologists at their stations with a feed from The Weather Channel, impacting at least 50 workers across their stations. This move has led to the layoff or reassignment of these workers, with reports indicating that the layoffs might affect around 100 meteorologists, according to some sources. These layoffs have sparked emotional farewells from the affected meteorologists, with some expressing their dismay on social media platforms.


  • Reasons for Layoffs: The decision to cut local weather teams seems to be part of a broader cost-cutting strategy. It has been suggested that Allen Media Group owes significant money to networks, leading to these layoffs as a way to manage expenses. Posts on social media have highlighted the negative impact this could have on local communities, as they lose personalized weather coverage.


  • Public Reaction: The layoffs have not been well-received by the public or former employees. There has been criticism regarding the impact on local journalism and the quality of weather reporting, with some arguing that it puts communities at risk by reducing localized, expert weather analysis. There's also a sentiment that this move reflects poorly on Allen Media Group's leadership and commitment to community service.


  • Broader Industry Context: These layoffs are part of a larger trend within the media industry, where companies are facing financial pressures due to declining viewership of linear television and the shift towards digital and streaming platforms. Allen Media Group's actions align with similar cost-cutting measures taken by other media organizations in 2024 and continuing into 2025, including layoffs at Vox Media, CNN, and Paramount, among others.


  • Legal and Community Impact: There have been calls for regulatory action, including suggestions that Allen Media Group should lose its broadcast license due to the reduction in local news and weather services. However, no specific legal actions against the company related to these layoffs have been reported yet.


This situation at Allen Media Group underlines the ongoing challenges in the news media industry, where financial sustainability often leads to significant workforce reductions, affecting both the employees and the quality of service provided to communities.

other media layoffs 2024


In 2024, the media industry experienced a significant wave of layoffs, affecting numerous major outlets across various sectors. Here's a detailed look at some key instances:


  • Los Angeles Times: The newspaper announced plans to lay off more than 20% of its newsroom staff, marking one of the largest staff reductions in its history. This came as the paper faced what was described as a "financial crisis."

  • Time Magazine: Time cut around 15% of its editorial staff in January 2024, continuing the trend of downsizing within traditional media outlets.

  • Business Insider: Announced it would trim its workforce by 8%, reflecting broader industry challenges.

  • Sports Illustrated: The iconic publication effectively shut down after its parent company, The Arena Group, lost the license to publish due to non-payment. This event resulted in extensive layoffs, with the entire editorial staff being let go.

  • Vice Media: Vice announced it would stop publishing on Vice.com and planned to cut several hundred jobs. This was part of a broader industry shift towards cost-cutting and restructuring.

  • Pitchfork: The music publication was folded into GQ, leading to significant layoffs as it was merged into another Condé Nast property.

  • National Geographic: Announced layoffs affecting its editorial staff, contributing to the ongoing narrative of downsizing in journalism.

  • NBC News: Underwent layoffs earlier in the year, with estimates suggesting between 50 to 100 employees were affected across the division.

  • Forbes: Announced layoffs impacting around 3% of its workforce, amidst a three-day walkout by union members protesting the cuts.

  • The Washington Post: Despite high-profile ownership, it had to resort to buyouts to prevent layoffs, though it still faced significant job cuts in 2023, which spilled into 2024.

  • Condé Nast: Staffers held a one-day strike to protest planned layoffs, which included merging Pitchfork into GQ.

  • CNN: Like many others, CNN faced layoffs as part of broader industry adjustments to the new digital landscape and changing consumer habits.

  • Vox Media: Continued to see job cuts, reflecting a strategy to refocus and reduce costs.

  • Paramount: Announced plans for layoffs, particularly in marketing, communications, finance, legal, and technology departments, as part of cost-saving measures ahead of a potential merger with Skydance Media.


These layoffs are indicative of a broader trend where media companies are grappling with declining traditional revenue streams, the shift to digital platforms, and the economic pressures of maintaining profitability. The industry's response has often been to reduce workforce, merge or close down operations, and pivot towards more sustainable business models or cost efficiencies.





Washington Post's website traffic dropped 90% during the Biden Harris administration


January 14, 2025 - Washington, D.C.


The Washington Post has experienced a 90% drop in its website traffic since its peak in January 2021. According to recent analyses and internal data, the Post's daily active users have plummeted from approximately 22.5 million at the beginning of the Biden administration to a mere 2.5-3 million by mid-2024.


This sharp decline in readership coincides with broader industry trends but has hit the Post particularly hard. The newspaper, once a powerhouse of digital news with significant influence during the Trump era, now faces challenges that reflect the changing landscape of news consumption and a possible shift in public interest.


Financial repercussions have been severe, with the Post reportedly losing $100 million last year alone. The decline in subscriber numbers and website traffic has led to significant layoffs, with about 4% of the workforce being cut in early January 2025. These measures are part of a broader strategy under new leadership to stabilize the publication's finances and adapt to the evolving media environment.


The reasons behind this monumental drop are multifaceted. Analysts point to a mix of factors including a less sensationalized news cycle post-Trump, changes in the Post's editorial direction, and the decision by owner Jeff Bezos not to endorse Vice President Kamala Harris. This last point, in particular, has sparked controversy and led to a backlash from readers, with many canceling their subscriptions in protest.


Moreover, the broader media industry's struggle with declining ad revenue, the move away from traditional news platforms to social media, and a general reader fatigue with political news might also be contributing to the Post's woes. The newspaper's attempt to pivot towards more balanced reporting and less partisan content has not been without critics, some of whom argue that this shift has alienated its core audience.


Despite these challenges, the Post has outlined a new strategy named "Build It," focusing on enhancing journalism quality, increasing customer satisfaction, and improving the publication's financial health.




CNN Falls to 17th Place in Primetime Ratings, Trails Behind Food Network


In an unprecedented twist in the cable television landscape, CNN has suffered a significant blow to its viewership, finishing 17th among all cable stations in primetime ratings for last week. This marks a new low for the network, which found itself outperformed by none other than the Food Network.


Despite a week filled with major news events, including the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and the ongoing developments around President-elect Donald Trump's Cabinet appointments, CNN's primetime shows drew only an average of 367,000 viewers. Shows like "Anderson Cooper 360," "The Source with Kaitlan Collins," and "CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip" failed to captivate audiences during the crucial 8-11 p.m. slot.


In stark contrast, the Food Network, renowned for its culinary shows rather than hard-hitting news, managed to attract more viewers. This situation underscores a broader trend of disinterest among viewers in traditional news programming, possibly due to fatigue or skepticism towards mainstream media outlets.


Fox News Channel continued to dominate the cable news arena with an impressive 2.5 million viewers in primetime, illustrating the widening gap between the networks. CNN's dismal performance in the key demographic of adults aged 25-54 was even more pronounced, with the network only managing to secure 67,000 viewers in this coveted group, placing it behind networks like TV Land and MTV.


This ratings debacle for CNN comes at a time when the network has been under scrutiny for its programming strategy and leadership changes. With the current CEO, Mark Thompson, at the helm, there's growing pressure to find a strategy that will revive CNN's viewership numbers before they fall further behind in the ever-competitive cable news market.


The implications of this ratings drop are significant, not just for CNN but for the broader landscape of cable news consumption. As viewers turn away from traditional news sources, networks are faced with the challenge of either adapting to new viewer habits or seeing their relevance wane in an increasingly fragmented media environment.


12/10/2024 -

__________































_________________________________

 


 

 

______________________________













__________















news media collapse, news media implosion, news media apocalypse,



176 views0 comments

Comentários


bottom of page